# Energy.

Energy is possibly the most basic and yet the most complex topic that exists in science, and is an area in science where I find the definitions a little slack, although I have no better ones. This post is intended to serve as a brief discussion around some points of interest to me. You will not find it a comprehensive overview of everything you need to know about energy. Instead you should see it as a collection of points that are often overlooked.

We often define energy as the ability to do work, but then we define work as the application of a force over a distance; which is the energy transferred to the object. This feels a bit like opening a dictionary and looking up energy and reading see work then looking up work and seeing energy transferred. I am being picky here – but my point is they are not great definitions when they create a circular reference. What I find in science is often the most mundane things are the hardest to define; and in actuality some of the more complex ideas, say the interchangeability of mass and energy are very easy. Of course this isn’t a rule that always holds water – it is just a general observation that I find to be true much of the time.

One thing that really irks me is that not enough time is given to the fact that all energies are roughly the same thing in one form or another, which is why it is appropriate to measure the thing in Joules all the time! Think about it… you can use the same unit for kinetic energy as you can for internal energy. This should make the curious student think. The reason is it all comes back to forces, work and fundamentally the same type of energy – the same thing classified in a different way. Let us illustrate a couple of examples. Say you have what is taught in school as the energy of heat and the energy of motion – kinetic energy and thermal energy. Now how different are these things? Well not really at all. All internal energy comprises of is increased vibration or motion of the particles within the substance. When a hot object is placed into a cool tank of water, the cooler atoms and the hotter atoms collide giving the cooler atoms more kinetic energy and the hotter atoms less until they reach an equilibrium point. So what we can see here is that internal energy is analogous to kinetic energy on a smaller scale. Similarly electrical energy is essentially the flow of electrons – electrons with kinetic energy. I am not saying everything is an exact direct relationship like the ones I have outlined, however with some creative licence you can get there.

Another thing is electromagnetic radiation – or energy in the form of say light. The thing about electromagnetic radiation is that it is so so central to Physics; why do they leave it so late to bring together all the good ideas!? Electromagnetic waves are simply regular disturbances in electric and magnetic fields that transport energy from one place to another. On the most basic level; that is it. X-rays, gamma rays, infrared, ultra-violet, visible light, radio – all the same thing. Look at it like this; an electromagnetic wave is one type of wave that can be defined by some certain features; the speed of propagation, the wavelength, the frequency and the amplitude. The speed does not change for any electromagnetic wave (in a vacuum) so that leaves us just three. So all of these different electromagnetic radiation sources you know of – all you need to do is take your one familiar wave, and understand the wavelength, amplitude and frequency then you can put a label on it. Appreciating this allows you know why for example something might be defined as both a radio wave and a micro wave.. they are not different waves or anything overly special; so as you increase the frequency and decrease the wavelength you start to transition from radio wave to microwave – a blended scale.

Finally, I think that we cover the equivalence of energy and mass at a date that is far far far too late and it is so important. Energy = mass and mass = energy. Plus because it is the most famous equation in physics (E=mc² I mean) it really hooks kids in. It makes you feel like you are doing the good stuff so early on. Discovering this, well that takes genius. But once it is discovered you can apply it to unlock the secrets of the atomic bomb, nuclear reactors.. you can understand why the sun gives off energy. But it is more that this in truth – it allows you to more fully appreciate what energy actually is. If you have mass you have energy stored within it, but on the other hand if you have energy you can create mass. You cannot destroy or create energy – why? Well one way of looking at this is to say any process where we might be able to create energy we would need something of mass to do this and if we were going to create something of mass we would need energy. They are the same thing. This isn’t 100% concrete, you could argue that you might be able to create more energy from a little mass etc – but experiments show you cannot.

That is the end of my ramblings on energy for today I think! Have some equations on energy to finish. Any questions – hit me up.

## 18 responses to “Energy.”

1. Nice post. I hadn’t really thought of it that way before but it makes it clearer. One thing that would be useful though is if you defined the terms in your equations at the bottom.

Liked by 1 person

• Thank you very much I am glad you like it! I will edit that in tomorrow, it’s 2am and I am falling asleep!

Liked by 1 person

2. In those equations in second line, there is equation for kinetic energy, potential energy and the last is what type? Great post btw.

Liked by 1 person

• So the first is kinetic as you point out, and then gravitational potential energy – the next one is the strain potential energy which truly isn’t too hard to understand. Basically what you learn from experiment is if you deform a spring, the more you deform it the greater the force it applies back – obviously. Well this is a linear relationship, which is proportional to half of the change in length squared, times by a constant – sometimes called the spring constant. Of course this applies in all sorts of situations…. a seatbelt stores strain potential energy which is what reduces your kinetic energy…. In truth the equations are a little inconsistent because if you are going to use the Δl then in truth you should use Δh for gravitational potential energy – is is the same logic. Under that then you have work equations – so just force times distance basically, and then power – the energy supplied per unit time. I imagine you knew most of this anyway!

Liked by 1 person

• Thanks for the explanation, thats cool! We just learned this last month so I saw already the other equations though in Czech we usually use other indexing and so on.

Liked by 1 person

• Yes I imagine a lot of the time when you look at this stuff you do know it it is just in a different format

Liked by 1 person

3. Just looked in the mirror and thought, ‘Hmm, need less mass and more energy!’ Nice post.

Liked by 4 people

• HAHA love that – great comment!! Joe

Liked by 1 person

4. Granted you’re a Physicist so you may be looking just at the scientific side of the situation, but you’re missing a big point here. The more philosophical aspect of it. One big point that was apparent to me in this, is that the fluctuation of energy no matter what state or motion, or compound. It is the same. So those sages across the world, talking about letting the universal energy within, or Hinduism’s Atman (roughly a “god soul”, don’t quote me tho!) is within all of us. All of these come together to the conclusion that accessing a higher energetic power is not only possible, but more than likely our main goal as a living being.

The energy is all around us in vibrations, sunlight, internal heat from people. Its all there.

Liked by 2 people

• It is a very interesting point – and one which I will not dismiss entirely. Obviously being a physicist by training I cannot entirely agree however it is true that the two things when viewed in the correct way can appear to have a level of overlap. The reason I am hesitant in giving full credit is that there are a lot of ideas that have turned out to also not be true, so it makes it some what hit and miss

Liked by 1 person

• Well I wasn’t able to be as descriptive with my thought as much as I wanted. As I was typing rather quickly to document that train of thought. Its more of the fact that there is an energy all around us, and no matter what religious connotation you make with that, its scientifically true.

By that idea then what does it take to tap into that energy, that vibration, or perhaps even the magnetic field of the Earth? There is a lot of studies that show the field has a lot more effects on the body than we are led to believe.

Liked by 1 person

5. Pingback: The Abundance of ENERGY – U.L.C.·

6. Pingback: Energy. | Prem Raj R Blog·

7. Hi Josef, I am maryam. I liked your topic and hope you to be energetic always.

Liked by 1 person

• Thank you very much! I am glad you enjoyed

Like