The beauty of being the same

As is the case with many of the important things in the universe, they pass by without due consideration. Today we muse over a funny old thing – symmetry. The feature photograph for this post is a photograph I took in St Isaac’s cathedral, just across from Hotel Astoria in St Petersburg where I had the good fortune of staying for 4 nights. Looking up at that dome really was breath taking and I can promise you I didn’t find Jesus – it is the symmetry that does it.

According to Wikipedia, which on this instance I have no cause to doubt the word itself originates from  Greek συμμετρία symmetria “agreement in dimensions, due proportion, arrangement”. When you think about it simply, symmetry is a mirror image – an exact replica of what is on one side on the other. To be honest for most cases this will actually do for understanding.  As human beings we are genetically coded to value symmetry – to celebrate it and all it brings us. Have you ever seen someone with an unsymmetrical face? Even I am not cruel enough to post pictures – but type it into Google images. The cold facts of the matter are that the more symmetrical you are, the more attractive you are likely to be perceived.

The human desire for symmetry does not stop at copulation – it extends much further than that. Think of any of the great landmarks that might spring into your head. The Eiffel Tower, the Taj Mahal, the Empire State, The Gherkin and so on – all of these buildings have been celebrated for their architectural brilliance and they are all ever so symmetrical. Take a look at the photo below – it is a great shot illustrating the point.



What is so exciting about symmetry is that it permeates through so much of life. Faces and buildings? Oh we are just getting started. Biology as discussed gives us symmetry and encodes us to value it so it isn’t really that much of a head scratcher that our constructions exhibit the same. Mathematically symmetry isn’t too hard to define – there are just different types of symmetry so it mixes things up a little. But let us not get too bogged down in this, the absolute key take away is that something is symmetrical when it is unchanged under transformation. This could indeed be reflection but it might be rotation; but one might take this even further. A very basic function that maps x to x is symmetric is it not? The input and the output are after all the same which sounds a lot like symmetry. In fact, we don’t need to be that basic – we can spread our wings a little more. In generally we can say that any mathematical operation exhibits symmetry if it preserves some property of the object to which it is applied; it need not be as simple as literally being unchanged.

The end result of all of this was always going to be some science – which is coming up right now. The most important idea here is moving something from one coordinate in space to another the laws of Physics should be the same. That is symmetry – we have performed a translation and preserved a property of the object which has undergone a transformation. Even deeper these laws should not vary with time – the results of an experiment (assuming no statistically driven outputs) should indeed yield the same on Monday and on Wednesday. This is basic physical symmetry.

A Nobel prize was awarded 7 years ago for work on the enticingly titled area of broken symmetry. In other words – things that happen in the world that are not quite symmetrical (don’t panic, they do happen and the Earth stays on its axis). This is yet another area where string theory is the only half respectable means we have of understanding what happens when symmetry breaks – and as we have stated before this is not yet proven. The front running theories say that there is symmetry between the fundamental forces in the universe that was somehow broken early in the universe which is why we see some of the quirks we do today.

With the mention of string theory in an article on symmetry we of course conclude with one of the lynchpins of the theory – supersymmetry ( I know, as if symmetry wasn’t enough for one evening). I do not intend to go into this at great depth namely because it is an area beyond my current full comprehension.  In brief elementary classes of particles are related by their spin – and within each of the two sets of elementary particles they can be paired off with a superpartner where everything is more or less the same except for the fact the spin differs by half an integer. This super-symmetry must be proven to be unbroken which it has not yet. Below is a simulation of what we are looking for – coming out of the large hadron collider under which the Higgs Boson is revealed, central to supersymmetry.



14 responses to “The beauty of being the same

  1. I prefer asymmetry. It’s the quirks and the odd details that make nature (and others) more attractive: a little mole by the mouth looks sexy, if you had a symmetrical mole on the other side of your face, you’d look weird! But I’m being silly, I know what you mean: there’s more to symmetry than bilateral symmetry; to me is more about cosmos vs chaos.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Sure, being same is beauty…. But the unevenness is also important.. When the universe formed, unevenness of matter was important for various big structures and small structures to form right!! Of at the end everything should become even or same…
    Please check out to get what I actually meant… Please do correct me, if I was wrong…😄


  3. looks like despite all scientific advancements it looks like all humans (mortals) are still zero without the divine 1………..
    Given the theory that the universe is a hologram and the theory of the many states of reality based on the observer (double slit experiment) and multi-verse /parallel universe simultaneously running alongside the current dimension in the time space dimensional theory all seem to be obeying the laws of symmetry….
    But Even the big bang theory collapses at the point where T=0 where every concept / construct of reality as we know it ceases to exist…..
    With the paradox of perceived duality arising from the singularity,and the plus and minus depicted on the Mathematic scale / ruler starting at zero (base observational / measuring point which also could be relational to time space dimensional observation based on the assumed standpoint of relational observation…….could the symmetry be just an in-built / default visionary factory setting of our eyes / lenses ?….. could the knowledge of breaking the symmetry or challenging the symmetry lead us to the wormhole / rabbit hole / salvation from the cyclical life of birth and death ?? cause and effect ?? and will be then nullified disappear from the cosmic equation ??….what is your take on this ?? it would be interesting to know…..


    • Wow! Quite a number of different concepts to digest in one email I am not quite sure I know where to being; reminds me of the contents page of Penrose’s Road to Reality! I think you question is could symmetry indeed be part of us – rather than part of nature i.e. built into the observer rather than the system? Personally I do not believe so for I think we can see the fingerprints of symmetry across the universe, which we observe long after the event has happened.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. As i personally believe proving any point is pointless and hence we have to accept all realities to remain constant as we are ever changing, which means both of us could be right or wrong simultaneously, the argument from the other side of the parallel universe within this discussion is that there is room for doubt on the dismissal of presence of symmetry within us as we are also part of the cosmic equation. There is a probability that we cant see the picture if we are in the frame. Or can we ?? Hell it’s that confounding paradox again….here is go again flying to my own conclusions / confusions…..Looks like I’m not sure of anything…that’s for sure….

    The symmetry is seen in our DNA, fingerprints (Physcial bodies) and our conditioned minds which also follow a particular pattern based on our social construct. long after symmetry is observed and the event has happened….In fact people with different mind-sets see events unfolding on the same event differently……..we can see it manifest in the unfolding republican -democrat debates and the war of words between civilizations….ripples / bubbles moving symmetrically from their respective observational standpoints …..seeing the world as they see it from their eyes…..the windows of soulful experiences of the senses….thru different symmetrical trajectory paths …

    Nothing to demean or be-little. Please be open and frank on your opinions for further advancement of our collective consciousness / self awareness. What is your take on this after factoring this possibility or probability ??


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s